Click here to read the full article.
On June 12, 1967, the Supreme Court made a landmark ruling in the case of Loving v. Virginia. In their decision, the highest court in the land struck down a Virginia ruling that criminalized the union of Richard Loving, white, and his wife Mildred, black.
(Hope no one thinks these were activist judges)
Since that ruling, which also toppled laws in some 15 other states, IR marriages have climbed: marriages between blacks and whites have increased from 65,000 in 1970 to 422,000 in 2005, according to Census Bureau figures.
Unfortunately, it is still more acceptable for black male-white female pairings than white male-black female. The article states:
“In some categories of interracial marriage, there are distinct gender-related trends. More than twice as many black men marry white women as vice versa, and about three-fourths of white-Asian marriages involve white men and Asian women.”
Really, why is it okay for the male to go outside of his race, but not the female? Someone needs to do a paper on that.
As a writer of interracial and multicultural romances, I’ve always tried to show that, despite apparent differences, there are common things that unite us: the quest for love, acceptance, and family. Whether you find that with someone who looks like you, has the same parts you do, or just accepts you as you, my wish is that you do find that.
The article concludes:
“Malignant racial biases can and do reside in interracial liaisons,” [Harvard law professor Randall] Kennedy wrote. “But against the tragic backdrop of American history, the flowering of multiracial intimacy is a profoundly moving and encouraging development.”
I don’t think I can add anymore to that. Peace and blessings.